What American Jews Believe
by Lawrence Hoffman, published in Commentary, August 1996.
We suffer less from lack of belief than from inadequate language to
express it. How can we believe what we do not even know how to
say? Conversations about belief often make honest people feel guilty
for doubting that they think everyone else knows for sure. We can
confirm or deny belief in “God,”, “revelation,” and so forth only by asking
first what these might mean rephrased for modern ears.
Consider the Sh’ma and its blessings, the daily liturgical staple that
affirms our faith in one sole God Who (a) creates all things, (b) reveals
Torah to Israel, and (c) promises redemption. What modern metaphors
capture best this threefold insistence on creation, revelation, and
redemption?
My metaphor combines time, space, and history. What astounds about the
universe is the aesthetic and scientific miracle by which the finely tuned
network of natural law accords so beautifully with mathematics. For
modern Jews, the doctrine of creation is the affirmation that the universe
has design. Revelation describes our faith that purpose has a place
within this cosmic order: in touch with ultimate wisdom, we humans can
matter in a grand scheme of which we know almost nothing but into which we
have been thrust. Redemption is the realization that, over the long
run, purpose within pattern gives us the right to hope. Pattern,
purpose, and hope are the contemporary equivalents of creation, revelation,
and redemption. They sustain us on the tiny bridge of time called
history.
If the age of just the earth (never mind the universe, which is four times
older) were a line in space equal to the distance from New York to Los
Angeles, Jewish history since Abraham and Sarah would cover only a few feet,
and human existence, prehistory and all, would encompass only part of a
single span of the Golden Gate or the George Washington bridge. The
Holocaust, therefore, in all its unspeakable horror, is insufficient to
shatter optimism. It is, as it were, a blip on the screen of cosmic
time. The state of Israel is a similar, albeit positive, tiny step in
time, an outpost of hope we must defend, but hardly a sudden sign of
imminent messianic victory, as some extremists imagine. Life is always
lived in the narrowness of bridge spans. Faith is the insistence that
the bridge goes somewhere, connecting past and future in a present that has
meaning.
For the bridge is not without direction. Creation pulses toward
ever-increasing freedom. If God is the power behind universal pattern,
the guarantor of purpose, and the ground for hope, we can say, in short,
that God wants human freedom; has designed a universe that invites it; and
summons Jews to champion it. The Jewish people’s moral purpose is to
tell our story of servitude and freedom, to act it out in ritual that
revives our vision and steels our nerve, and then to demonstrate in all we
do our faith in freedom as the redemptive end of history.
Beyond the moral opposition of freedom and enslavement, Judaism codes the
world also as kodesh or bol, the holy or the everyday. We move from
slavery to freedom; but back and forth between kodesh and bol. Torah
is a clarion call for freedom and a blueprint for meaningful human life in
the holy and the everyday.
“Holy” (or “sacred”) likewise requires modern translation. It means
nonutilitarian – like Hanukkah candles which our liturgy says “are holy; we
have no right to use them.” Sacred relationships are those where
people do not use each other. God is uniquely holy (beyond
manipulation). We have holy times and places, too: like the
Sabbath, when we do no utilitarian work, or the kotel (the Western Wall),
where we stop to pray but from which we derive no secular gain.
We humans have access to only that single quadrant of the space/time
continuum which we call our present. We cannot see it “all at once” –
a metaphor combining space (“all”) and time (“at once”). The Jewish
map is thus an ellipse, revolving equally about two centers: Israel
and the Diaspora. Diaspora Jewry sanctifies time; Jews in Israel
sanctify space. We need them both. I am a religious Zionist in
that I strive for redemption in our land (space), but also in history
(time).
Given my faith in freedom, I am not dismayed by (as the editors put it)
“movements of personal and sexual liberation.” I even understand
(though I do not welcome) “assimilating or otherwise falling away.”
Increased options are the price of freedom, which (as I say) “God wants,”
and so should we.
I decry the reactionary call to reign in freedom, and the provocative
rhetoric that pits the “good Jewish guys” against the bad. Endemic
moral chaos and increasingly marginal Jewish identity derive less from the
suspension of limits by those in authority than from our society’s
widespread suspicion that life is meaningless. Here, I do indeed see
the prospect of large-scale Jewish revival (Commentary’s word, not mine; I
do not think we are dead), since Judaism is uniquely outfitted to provide
demonstrations of human meaning, for ours is a story that celebrates
freedom, while affirming pattern, purpose, and hope.
Here is the challenge: to overcome old habits that ground Jewish
survival in fear of anti-Semitism and memories of European ethnicity.
A century ago we needed Jewish hospitals, colleges, clubs, and centers – for
Jews were not welcome in the mainstream. Now we need local communities
of the sacred, where people come to mark life’s passages and discover the
Jewish way of making sense of the world. We have been conditioned by a
“foreign affairs” agenda – saving Jewish lives abroad and founding a Jewish
state, for which we successfully galvanized the combined power, wealth, and
corporate wisdom of national organizations. The struggle to save
ourselves is a different challenge, requiring small-scale communal care
suffused with religious vision. What Federations were to the world we
are leaving, synagogues must become for the world we are building. But
they will have to transform themselves from old-time ethnic addresses to
spiritual oases, sacred centers where the realities of pattern, purpose, and
hope are beyond doubt.
Jews by choice are a particular source of promise for us. A
post-ethnic Judaism requires no particular old-country memories. It
overcomes loneliness and fragmentation with life led daily in committed and
caring community. Here is a spiritual invitation worth opting for,
especially in an age where people seek out meaning. But meaning is a
lifelong search, and so, finally, revival requires that we outgrow our
obsession with childhood education at the expense of attending to Judaism’s
adult message. Judaism should be recast as intellectually satisfying
and emotionally enriching to the most discerning adults among us, for a
religion worth affirming cannot be for children only.
I welcome denominationalism as an increase in Jewish options, but I fear
triumphalism and closed-mindedness. There is no single standard of
Jewish authenticity. As I respect other Jewish choices that I cannot
personally espouse, I expect others to esteem as equally profound my own
determination to be a Reform Jew. I too am engaged in an age-old task
of Jewish survival and the ever-new hope that I may help those I meet on the
bridge of time that is my life.
Lawrence A. Hoffman is a rabbi and professor of liturgy at Hebrew Union College (Reform) in New York. He is the author or editor of eleven books, including, most recently, Covenant of Blood: Circumcision and Gender in Rabbinic Judaism, and a complete revision of Morris N. Kertzer’s classic introduction to Judaism, What is a Jew?